Guide
What a perc test measures, how soil evaluation differs, and why the result decides your entire system design.
Before a system can be designed, someone has to establish how fast the soil at the field location accepts water and how far it is to groundwater or rock. That answer sets the application rate, which sets the absorption area, which — along with what the site cannot support — sets the system type and most of the cost.
Holes are bored to trench depth, pre-soaked so the soil is at field capacity, then filled with water. The drop is timed and reported in minutes per inch. Fast rates mean sandy, permeable soil; slow rates mean tight soil that needs a much larger field.
| Perc rate | Reading | Implication |
|---|---|---|
| Under 5 min/inch | Very fast | May need extra separation to groundwater |
| 5 – 30 min/inch | Good | Conventional gravity field |
| 31 – 60 min/inch | Moderate | Larger field, still conventional |
| 61 – 90 min/inch | Slow | Very large field or an alternative system |
| Over 90 min/inch | Failing | Mound or aerobic, usually |
Many states have moved away from perc tests toward a soil profile evaluation. A licensed evaluator digs a pit, reads the horizons, and records texture, structure, and the redoximorphic features that mark the seasonal high water table. It is more reliable, because a single hole full of water tells you very little about what the soil does across a wet spring.
A failure is rarely absolute. The usual paths forward are a mound system, an aerobic treatment unit with a reduced field, pressure distribution to spread the load, or relocating the field to a better part of the parcel. All cost more. None are impossible.